4.2 Article

Coulomb potentials in 5-layer graphene structures: inhomogeneity effects

期刊

INDIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
卷 96, 期 12, 页码 3535-3540

出版社

INDIAN ASSOC CULTIVATION SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1007/s12648-022-02302-6

关键词

Coulomb potentials; Multilayer graphene structures; Inhomogeneity effects; Long-wavelength limit

资金

  1. Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City (VNU-HCM) [C2021-16-06]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the Coulomb bare interactions in a 5-layer graphene structure were analytically calculated in an inhomogeneous background dielectric. The results showed that the inhomogeneity of the dielectric environment significantly affected the intra- and interlayer Coulomb bare interactions, leading to noticeable differences in values at critical momentum. Additionally, in the long-wavelength limit, interactions between charged particles in the structure were found to depend only on the dielectric constant of the outermost layers.
We analytically calculate the Coulomb bare interactions in a 5-layer graphene structure consisting of five graphene sheets assembled in an inhomogeneous background dielectric. By solving the Poisson equation, we obtained the analytical expressions for 25 elements of the Coulomb potential tensor in the system. Our calculations demonstrate that the intra- and the interlayer Coulomb bare interactions are significantly affected by the inhomogeneity of the dielectric environment. This factor creates noticeable differences in values between Coulomb potentials in inhomogeneous systems and those in the homogeneous ones at critical momentum despite they behave as decreasing functions of wave vector. In the long-wavelength limit, the interactions between charged particles in the structure depend only on the dielectric constant of the outermost layers. The Coulomb bare interactions are applied to calculate the dynamical dielectric function of 5-layer graphene structures, and the results show significant differences, compared to those in the homogeneous case.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据