4.6 Article

Addressing Climate Change Vulnerability in the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems-Results Demonstrated for a Cross-Section of Major Vegetation-Based Ecosystem Types in the United States

期刊

LAND
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/land11020302

关键词

Red List of Ecosystems; environmental degradation; adaptive capacity; climate change vulnerability; exposure; resilience; sensitivity; upland ecosystem

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The IUCN Red List of Ecosystems is a global standard for assessing ecosystem risk, and a new framework was used to assess climate change vulnerability of upland ecosystems in the United States.
The IUCN Red List of Ecosystems (RLE) is a global standard for ecosystem risk assessment that integrates data and knowledge to document the relative risk status of ecosystem types as critically endangered (CR), endangered (EN), and vulnerable (VU). A series of indicators for each type gauge the probability of range wide collapse. Climate change vulnerability can factor into RLE assessments, especially as indicators of climate change severity under the criteria for environmental degradation over the recent and upcoming 50 years. We applied a new framework to assess climate change vulnerability-and thus, severity of climate change degradation-to a cross-section of 33 upland ecosystem types in the United States to demonstrate this input to the RLE. The framework addressed climate exposure and ecosystem resilience. Measures of climate change exposure used climate projections for the mid-21st century compared against a 20th century baseline. Augmenting measures in use for RLE assessment, measures of resilience included several for adaptive capacity, including topoclimate variability, diversity with functional species groups, and vulnerability of any keystone species. All 33 types were listed as VU (n = 22), EN (n = 9), or CR (n = 2) and 51% scored at least one step higher (e.g., LC up to VU) from climate change severity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据