4.6 Article

Improved characterization of Feshbach resonances and interaction potentials between 23Na and 87Rb atoms

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
卷 105, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.105.023313

关键词

-

资金

  1. Hong Kong RGC General Research Fund [14303317, 14301818]
  2. Collaborative Research Fund [C6005-17G]
  3. U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/P01058X/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research provides an improved characterization of the commonly used Feshbach resonance between Na-23 and Rb-87 in their absolute ground states, and presents a series of experimental results regarding the measurement of binding energies and calculation of potential energies via magnetic-field modulation. Additionally, ten additional Feshbach resonances are observed in different combinations of Zeeman sublevels of the F = 1 hyperfine states.
The ultracold mixture of Na-23 and Rb-87 atoms has become an important system for investigating physics in Bose-Bose atomic mixtures and for forming ultracold ground-state polar molecules. In this work, we provide an improved characterization of the most commonly used Feshbach resonance near 347.64 G between Na-23 and Rb-87 in their absolute ground states. We form Feshbach molecules using this resonance and measure their binding energies by dissociating them via magnetic-field modulation. We use the binding energies to refine the singlet and triplet potential-energy curves, using coupled-channel bound-state calculations. We then use coupled-channel scattering calculations on the resulting potentials to produce a high-precision mapping between magnetic field and scattering length. We also observe ten additional s-wave Feshbach resonances for Na-23 and Rb-87 in different combinations of Zeeman sublevels of the F = 1 hyperfine states. Some of the resonances show two-body inelastic decay due to spin exchange. We compare the resonance properties with coupled-channel scattering calculations that full take account of inelastic properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据