4.8 Article

Identifying legitimacy: Experimental evidence on compliance with authority

期刊

SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 8, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abj7377

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1555494, 1556047]
  2. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie
  3. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences [1555494] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie
  5. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences [1556047] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The extent to which individuals perceive legitimacy affects their intrinsic motivations to comply with authority. An experimental approach is proposed to separate the effects of an authority's costly actions on citizen behavior through both intrinsic and extrinsic channels. The findings provide credible evidence that an authority's actions can directly shape citizens' behavior by enhancing their legitimacy.
To what extent do individuals' perceptions of legitimacy affect their intrinsic motivations to comply with an authority? Answering this question has critical implications for law enforcement but is challenging because actions or institutions that affect intrinsic motivations typically also affect extrinsic, material ones. To disentangle these, we propose an experimental approach that separately identifies the effect of an authority's costly action to improve enforcement fairness on citizen behavior through both intrinsic and extrinsic channels. In experiment 1, the authority's simple attempt to institute fairer enforcement increases prosocial behavior by 10 to 12 percentage points via the intrinsic channel. A follow-up experiment demonstrates that this is not motivated by citizen attempts to pay back authorities. Our findings provide causally credible evidence that an authority's actions can directly shape citizens' behavior by enhancing her legitimacy and have important implications in policy domains where this conflicts with other incentives.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据