4.6 Article

A wearable AIEgen-based lateral flow test strip for rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 RBD protein and N protein

期刊

CELL REPORTS PHYSICAL SCIENCE
卷 3, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrp.2022.100740

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFE0132200]
  2. NSFC [51961160730, 51873092, 81921004]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  4. Tianjin Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [19JCJQJC61200]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed test strips for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 using AIE luminogens as reporters, achieving high sensitivity and specificity with limits of detection as low as 6.9 ng/mL for RBD protein and 7.2 ng/mL for N protein. The integration of the test strips onto N95 masks simplified the sampling procedures and showed high anti-interference capacity in complex biosamples.
Accurate and rapid detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is significant for early tracing, isolation, and treatment of infected individuals, which will efficiently prevent large-scale transmission of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Here, two kinds of test strips for receptor binding domain (RBD) and N antigens of SARS-CoV-2 are established with high sensitivity and specificity, in which AIE luminogens (AIE-gens) are utilized as reporters. Because of the high brightness and resistance to quenching in aqueous solution, the limit of detection can be as low as 6.9 ng/mL for RBD protein and 7.2 ng/mL for N protein. As an antigen collector, an N95 mask equipped with a test strip with an excellent enrichment effect would efficiently simplify the sampling procedures. Compared with a test strip based on Au nanoparticles or fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), the AIEgen-based test strip shows high anti-interference capacity in complex biosamples. Therefore, an AIEgen-based test strip assay could be built as a promising platform for emergency use during the pandemic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据