4.4 Review

Diversity of Japanese consumers' requirements, sensory perceptions, and eating preferences for meat

期刊

ANIMAL SCIENCE JOURNAL
卷 93, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/asj.13705

关键词

consumer; diversity; Japan; meat; preference

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS KAKENHI) [21700746, 23700898, 21K02144]
  2. Science and Technology Research Promotion Program for Agriculture, Forestry, Fisheries and Food Industry [25064C, 27005B]
  3. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF)
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21K02144, 21700746, 23700898] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article discusses the diversity of Japanese consumers in terms of their preferences, sensory perception, and eating habits, and emphasizes the importance of understanding this diversity for optimizing meat production and distribution.
Japanese consumers are generally characterized as preferring high marbling in beef and pork and choosing domestic products. However, the Japanese food market is not homogenous. Understanding the diversity of Japanese consumers will provide benefits for the optimization of meat production and distribution in Japan. This article focuses on three factors affecting purchasing decisions and eating satisfaction, namely, requirements, sensory perception, and eating preferences, in order to understand the diversity of Japanese consumers in a simplified manner. Diversity was observed in Japanese consumers in all three of these factors (requirements, perception, and preference) using a questionnaire survey, sensory and biological procedures, and an eating preference test. These diversities are due to not only sociodemographic characteristics but also biological and physiological factors, background culture, and individual attitudes and criteria. Although consumer variation based on sociodemographic characteristics is of course important, it is equally important to understand diversity by focusing on the individual differences among consumers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据