3.8 Article

First, They Came for the Old and Demented Care and Relations in the Age of Artificial Intelligence and Social Robots

期刊

HUMAN ARENAS
卷 5, 期 1, 页码 25-43

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s42087-020-00125-7

关键词

Care; AI; Social robots; Deception; Hedonism; Ethics; Utilitarianism

资金

  1. Ostfold University College

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of healthcare technology has brought artificial intelligence into the domain of care. While AI has the potential to improve patient welfare and working conditions, there is also a risk of imbalance in human-machine relationships and dependence on machines.
Health care technology is all the rage, and artificial intelligence (AI) has long since made its inroads into the previously human-dominated domain of care. AI is used in diagnostics, but also in therapy and assistance, sometimes in the form of social robots with fur, eyes and programmed emotions. Patient welfare, working conditions for the caretakers and cost-efficiency are routinely said to be improved by employing new technologies. The old with dementia might be provided with a robot seal, or a humanoid companion robot, and if these companions increase the happiness of the patients, why should we not venture down this road? Come to think of it, when we have these machines, why not use them as tutors in our schools and caretakers for our children? More happiness reported, as our children are entertained, well-nourished, well-trained and never alone. Lovely and loving robots have also been made, and happiness abounds when these are provided to lonely adults. Happiness all around, and a hedonistic heaven - the utilitarian's dream, as reported, or measured, well-being reaches all-time highs. But there is a reason to be wary of this development. The logic that allows this development ultimately leads to the conclusion that we would all be best off if we could simply be wired to a computer that provided us with whatever we needed to feel perfectly satisfied. The care-giving machines are here.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据