4.7 Article

Exploiting locality in high-dimensional Factorial hidden Markov models

期刊

出版社

MICROTOME PUBL

关键词

Factorial hidden Markov models; filtering; smoothing; EM algorithm; high-dimensions

资金

  1. Alan Turing Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes algorithms for approximate filtering and smoothing in high-dimensional Factorial hidden Markov models. The approximation involves discarding likelihood factors based on a notion of locality in a factor graph associated with the emission distribution, thus avoiding the high computational cost of exact filtering and smoothing. The paper proves that the approximation accuracy is dimension-free, meaning that it does not degrade as the overall dimension of the model increases. The paper also analyzes the error introduced by localizing the likelihood function in a Bayes' rule update, and demonstrates the application of the new algorithms on synthetic examples and a London Underground passenger flow problem.
We propose algorithms for approximate filtering and smoothing in high-dimensional Factorial hidden Markov models. The approximation involves discarding, in a principled way, likelihood factors according to a notion of locality in a factor graph associated with the emission distribution. This allows the exponential-in-dimension cost of exact filtering and smoothing to be avoided. We prove that the approximation accuracy, measured in a local total variation norm, is dimension-free in the sense that as the overall dimension of the model increases the error bounds we derive do not necessarily degrade. A key step in the analysis is to quantify the error introduced by localizing the likelihood function in a Bayes' rule update. The factorial structure of the likelihood function which we exploit arises naturally when data have known spatial or network structure. We demonstrate the new algorithms on synthetic examples and a London Underground passenger flow problem, where the factor graph is effectively given by the train network.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据