4.7 Article

Quantum scale invariant gravity in the de Donder gauge

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 105, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.066001

关键词

-

资金

  1. JSPS Kakenhi [21K03539]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21K03539] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we perform the manifestly covariant quantization of a scale invariant gravity with a scalar field in the de Donder gauge condition. By deriving various equal-time (anti)commutation relations, it is shown that the general action with the de Donder gauge possesses a Poincare-like IOSp(8 vertical bar 8) supersymmetry. The paper also derives the equal-time commutation relations for the gravitational sector involving the metric tensor and scalar fields, and explains how scale symmetry is spontaneously broken in quantum gravity, showing that the dilaton is a massless Nambu-Goldstone particle.
We perform the manifestly covariant quantization of a scale invariant gravity with a scalar field, which is equivalent to the well-known Brans-Dicke gravity via a field redefinition of the scalar field, in the de Donder gauge condition (or harmonic gauge condition) for general coordinate invariance. First, without specifying the expression of a gravitational theory, we write down various equal-time (anti)commutation relations (ETCRs), in particular, those involving the Nakanishi-Lautrup field, the Faddeev-Popov (FP) ghost, and the FP antighost only on the basis of the de Donder gauge condition. It is shown that choral symmetry, which is a Poincare-like IOSp(8 vertical bar 8) supersymmetry, can be derived from such a general action with the de Donder gauge. Next, taking the scale invariant gravity with a scalar field as a classical theory, we derive the ETCRs for the gravitational sector involving the metric tensor and scalar fields. Moreover, we account for how scale symmetry is spontaneously broken in quantum gravity, thereby showing that the dilaton is a massless Nambu-Goldstone particle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据