4.6 Article

Analysis of Connected Arrays and Capacitively Coupled Arrays

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 28147-28154

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3156594

关键词

Impedance; Antenna arrays; Dipole antennas; Wideband; Broadband antennas; Mathematical models; Couplings; Array active impedance; array scan impedance; connected array; tightly-coupled array; wideband array antenna

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the concept of connected and capacitively coupled dipoles in a planar array to improve wideband performance. The results show that the impedance mismatch of a connected/capacitively coupled dipole array is smaller than that of an array of unconnected dipoles, and capacitive coupling performs better than a direct connection. This is significant for the design of wideband array antennas.
The concept of connected and capacitively coupled dipoles in a planar array, which improves wideband performance, is investigated. A long wire with multiple feeds acts as an array in connected arrays, whereas a capacitively coupled array uses capacitors between array elements. Both approaches attempt to approximate the current sheet of Wheeler. Using spectral Green's function, the array active impedance is calculated. The impedance mismatch of a connected/capacitively coupled dipole array is less than that of an array of unconnected dipoles of the same size. Both direct and capacitive connections can be used to design a wideband array antenna with a ground plane, although capacitive coupling performs better than a direct connection. This fact resulted from numerous analytical studies using infinite dipole array scan (active) impedance endorsed by full-wave simulations using CST MWS. The maximum mismatch losses over the frequency band for different source (reference) impedances are used to find the best solution at the broadside. The average reflected power over all scan angles is applied, for the scan performance, and then, the maximum average mismatch loss over the frequency band is investigated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据