4.7 Article

High-pressure bandgap engineering and amorphization in TiNb2O7 single crystals

期刊

CRYSTENGCOMM
卷 24, 期 14, 页码 2660-2666

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2ce00168c

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program [2017YFA0403704]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11574112, 11974129, 12074141]
  3. Program for Science and Technology of the Education Department of Jilin Province [JJKH20211036KL]
  4. Jilin Provincial Science and Technology Development Project [20210402054GH, 20210509038RQ]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, TiNb2O7 single crystals were grown by the optical floating zone method and the bandgap of TiNb2O7 was modified through high-pressure engineering. The pressure-dependent properties and structure information of TiNb2O7 crystals under compression were characterized using in situ Raman spectroscopy and angle dispersive synchrotron radiation X-ray diffraction. The crystals became amorphous during compression and remained amorphous under ambient conditions.
Titanium niobate (TiNb2O7) possesses excellent photocatalytic properties, dielectric properties, and lithium-insertion capacity. High-pressure (HP) treatment is a powerful tool for bandgap engineering aiming at widening its applications. Herein, we report the growth of TiNb2O7 single crystals by the optical floating zone (OFZ) method and the engineering of the TiNb2O7 bandgap via HP. To obtain the physical mechanism of the bandgap variation under HP, the detailed pressure-dependent properties and structure information have been characterized by using in situ Raman spectroscopy and angle dispersive synchrotron radiation X-ray diffraction (ADXRD). During compression, the TiNb2O7 crystals were amorphized and the amorphized phase was maintained under ambient conditions. The microstructures of the uncompressed crystalline and decompressed amorphized samples have also been investigated accordingly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据