4.7 Article

Synthesis, structure, and electrochemical properties of [LNi(Rf)(C4F8)]- and [LNi(Rf)3]- complexes

期刊

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
卷 51, 期 14, 页码 5515-5523

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2dt00511e

关键词

-

资金

  1. Office of Basic Energy Sciences of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-SC0009363]
  2. University of Cologne
  3. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0009363] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of new anionic nickelate complexes were synthesized and characterized, and their electrochemical properties were studied. The results showed that the complexes exhibited different oxidation-reduction behaviors, and the NHC ligand environment played an important role in the release of trifluoromethyl and perfluoroalkyl radicals.
The new anionic nickelate complexes [(MeCN)Ni(C4F8)(CF3)](-), [(MeCN)Ni(C4F8)(C2F5)](-), [(IMes)Ni(C4F8)(CF3)](-), [(IMes)Ni(CF3)(3)](-) (IMes = 1,3-bis(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)imidazol-2-ylidene), and [(F-NHC)Ni(R-f)(3)](-) (F-NHC = 1,3-bis(2,4-F2Ph), 2,4,6-F3Ph- or 3,4,5-F3Ph)imidazol-2-ylidene; (R-f = CF3 or C2F5) were synthesized and structurally characterized. The electrochemical properties of all new compounds were revealed by cyclic voltammetry studies and compared to the known CF3 analogue [(MeCN)Ni(CF3)(3)](-). The IMes-coordinated complexes exhibited initial oxidation events that were well-separated from a second oxidation process in the cyclic voltammograms. The complexes containing F-substituted NHC ligands [(F-NHC)Ni(CF3)(3)](-) are structurally quite similar to the IMes derivative and reveal also two separated oxidation waves in their cyclic voltammograms. The absolute potentials as well as the separation between the two waves vary with the substitution pattern, suggesting that the NHC ligand environment (NHC = N-heterocyclic carbene) is an interesting platform for the development of new redox-triggered reactions that release trifluoromethyl and perfluoroalkyl radicals upon oxidation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据