3.8 Article

Sustainability awareness in engineering design through serious gaming

期刊

DESIGN SCIENCE
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/dsj.2022.9

关键词

gamification; serious gaming; decision-making; sustainability; design space exploration; aerospace

资金

  1. Swedish Knowledge and Competence Development Foundation (Stiftelsen for kunskapsoch kompetensutveckling) through the Model-Driven Development and Decision Support research profile at the Blekinge Institute of Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sustainability considerations are often difficult to balance with technical and business requirements in the early design phase. Serious gaming is an emerging approach that can raise awareness among design teams, users, and stakeholders about the expected behavior of a solution throughout its life cycle, thus improving sustainability awareness.
Sustainability considerations are traditionally difficult to trade-off with technical and business requirements in an early design phase. Hence, design teams need support to reflect early on in the process, on how sustainability may affect profitability and customer value fulfilment in the long term. The commoditisation of modelling and simulation techniques points to gamification and serious gaming as emerging approaches to raise awareness among the design team - as well as users and stakeholders - of the expected behaviour of a solution along its life cycle. The objective of this paper is to explore how serious games can be used to inform decision-makers about the value versus cost implications of being (or not being) 'sustainability compliant' when designing products and systems. The paper initially presents the findings from a descriptive study focused on the definition of 'design support' intended to raise sustainability awareness through serious gaming. It further describes the development, application and testing of one of such games for material selection in the aerospace industry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据