4.8 Article

N-gene-complementary antisense-oligonucleotide directed molecular aggregation of dual-colour carbon dots, leading to efficient fluorometric sensing of SARS-COV-2 RNA

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 14, 期 13, 页码 5112-5120

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1nr07169f

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) [R03EB028026, R03 EB028026-02S2, R03 EB028026-02S1]
  2. University of Maryland Baltimore (UMB)
  3. University of Maryland Baltimore County (UMBC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports a method for highly specific molecular aggregation using carbon dots and complementary antisense oligonucleotide sequences in the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. The sensor can differentiate between different coronaviruses and has high detection sensitivity.
The early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic punctuated the need for rapid, mass testing for early detection of viral infection. Carbon dots are easily synthesized, cost-effective fluorescent nanoparticles whose surface functionalities enable facile conjugation with biorecognition elements suitable for molecular detection of viral RNA. Herein, we report that a pair of complementary antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) sequences can lead to a highly specific molecular aggregation of dual colour carbon dots (CDs) in the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. The nanoprobes used ASOs highly specific to the N-gene of SARS-COV-2. When the ASOs are conjugated to blue and yellow citric acid-derived CDs, the combination of the ASO-CD pairs facilitates aggregation-induced emission enhancement (AIEE) of the measured fluorescence after hybridization with SARS-CoV-2 RNA. We found the sensor capable of differentiating between MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 samples and was found to have a limit of detection of 81 copies per mu L. Additionally, we used dialysis to demonstrate that the change in emission upon aggregation is dependent on the compositional heterogeneity of the conjugated-carbon dot mixture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据