4.6 Article

Rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry (REIMS) combined with chemometrics for real-time beer analysis

期刊

ANALYTICAL METHODS
卷 14, 期 15, 页码 1540-1546

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2ay00063f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2020/01064-6]
  2. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [302748/2018-0]
  3. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) [001]
  4. Waters Corporation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry was used to analyze 32 different beers, successfully discriminating brands and types with high accuracy. This provides an efficient analytical method for quality control in the beer industry.
The beer industry plays an important role in the economy since this is the third most consumed beverage worldwide. Efficient analytical methods must be developed to ensure the quality of the product. Rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry (REIMS) can provide molecular-level information, while enabling fast analysis. REIMS requires minimal sample preparation and it is ideal for the analysis of homogeneous liquid samples, such as beers, within only five seconds. In this article, 32 different beers were analyzed by REIMS in positive and negative ionization modes using a hybrid quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer. The positive and negative MS spectrum blocks were augmented for data fusion. A predictive model by partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) was used to discriminate the samples (i) by their brands and (ii) by the beer type (Premium and Standard American lagers). The results showed that REIMS provided a rich fingerprint of beers, which was successfully used to discriminate the brands and types with 96.9% and 97.9% accuracy, respectively. We believe that this proof-of-concept has great potential to be applied on a larger scale for industrial purposes due to its high-throughput.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据