3.8 Proceedings Paper

A reverse engineering approach for modeling of barely visible impact damage by combining results of non-destructive testing and numerical simulations

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.prostr.2022.01.077

关键词

damage identification; damage indices; curvelet transform

资金

  1. National Science Centre, Poland [2017/25/N/ST8/01009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents an approach based on reverse engineering to evaluate the structural residual life of composite elements affected by low-velocity impact loading. By combining non-destructive testing and numerical simulations, the geometric properties of damage were determined, and computer-aided design models were developed to predict the structural response.
An evaluation of the structural residual life for composite elements affected by low-velocity impact loading is a challenging task due to the uncertainty of an influence of the resulting damage on the mechanical properties of a structure, which cannot be truly assessed without destructive testing. To overcome this deficiency, an approach based on reverse engineering was developed. Within this approach the results of non-destructive testing (NDT) are considered, namely the results of X-ray computed tomography as well as ultrasonic testing in B- and C-scan modes, for an evaluation of the geometrical properties of damage as well as the results of numerical simulations of impact testing of the composite were used to support the experimental results. Based on the obtained results, the generic shapes of barely visible impact damage (BVID) in composite structures were determined, and based on the generic shapes and the obtained relations between the damage extent and the impact energy, a parametric computer-aided design models were developed. The obtained models allow predicting the structural response, including the estimation of the residual life of composite structures in finite element simulation environments. (C) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据