4.7 Article

Comparative analysis of Streptococcus suis genomes identifies novel candidate virulence-associated genes in North American isolates

期刊

VETERINARY RESEARCH
卷 53, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13567-022-01039-8

关键词

Streptococcus suis; virulence-associated genes (VAGs); pathotype; comparative genomics

资金

  1. Minnesota State Legislature through the Rapid Agricultural Response Fund [00057268]
  2. Minnesota Pork Board
  3. Pork Checkoff
  4. USDA National Needs Fellowship [2016-38420-25288]
  5. University of Minnesota (UMN) MnDRIVE Global Food Ventures Fellowship
  6. UMN Informatics Institute Fellowship awards

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pan-genome analysis of Streptococcus suis identified novel candidate virulence-associated genes (VAGs) and proposed a genotyping scheme for predicting pathogenicity. Mobile genetic elements carrying antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) were also identified.
Streptococcus suis is a significant economic and welfare concern in the swine industry. Pan-genome analysis provides an in-silico approach for the discovery of genes involved in pathogenesis in bacterial pathogens. In this study, we performed pan-genome analysis of 208 S. suis isolates classified into the pathogenic, possibly opportunistic, and commensal pathotypes to identify novel candidate virulence-associated genes (VAGs) of S. suis. Using chi-square tests and LASSO regression models, three accessory pan-genes corresponding to S. suis strain P1/7 markers SSU_RS09525, SSU_RS09155, and SSU_RS03100 (>95% identity) were identified as having a significant association with the pathogenic pathotype. The proposed novel SSU_RS09525 + /SSU_RS09155 + /SSU_RS03100 + genotype identified 96% of the pathogenic pathotype strains, suggesting a novel genotyping scheme for predicting the pathogenicity of S. suis isolates in North America. In addition, mobile genetic elements carrying antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) and VAGs were identified but did not appear to play a major role in the spread of ARGs and VAGs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据