4.6 Article

Slow spin dynamics in the hyperhoneycomb lattice [(C2H5)3NH]2Cu2(C2O4)3 revealed by 1H NMR studies

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 105, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.L100405

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) , Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering
  2. U.S. DOE by Iowa State University [DE-AC02-07CH11358]
  3. NSF CAREER [DMR-1944975]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The results show that the Cu spin coupling in the three-dimensional hyperhoneycomb lattice compound CCCO has an average antiferromagnetic exchange coupling value of about 50 K, with Cu spin fluctuations slowing down at low temperatures exhibiting thermally activated behavior.
We report the results of magnetic susceptibility chi and H-1 nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements on a three-dimensional hyperhoneycomb lattice compound [(C2H5)(3)NH](2)Cu-2(C2O4)(3) (CCCO). The average value of the antiferromagnetic (AFM) exchange coupling between the Cu2+ (S = 1/2) spins was determined to be J similar to 50 K from the chi measurements. No long-range magnetic ordering has been observed down to T = 50 mK, although NMR lines become slightly broader at low temperatures below 1 K. The broadening of the NMR spectrum observed below 1 K reveals that the Cu spin moments remain at this temperature, suggesting a non-spin-singlet ground state. The temperature and magnetic field dependence of 1/T-1 at temperatures above 20 K is well explained by paramagnetic thermal spin fluctuations where the fluctuation frequency of Cu2+ spins is higher than the NMR frequency of the order of megahertz. However, a clear signature of the slowing down of the Cu2+ spin fluctuations was observed at low temperatures where 1/T-1 shows a thermally activated behavior. The magnetic field dependence of the magnitude of the spin excitation gap suggests that the magnetic behaviors of CCCO are characterized as an AFM chain at low temperatures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据