Effect of substrate clamping on evolution of properties in homovalent and heterovalent relaxor thin films

Relaxor ferroelectrics, well known for their large dielectric and piezoelectric response, are attracting growing interest in thin-film form driven by a need for miniaturized devices. Fundamental understanding and control of the performance of relaxors as thin films, however, is underdeveloped relative to studies of bulk versions. One obvious challenge is substrate clamping, which reduces the dielectric and piezoelectric response, yet systematic comparisons of the effect of substrate clamping on different relaxor materials is missing. Here, the impact of epitaxial constraint on the relaxor behavior and properties of both homovalent BaZr0.5Ti0.5O3 and heterovalent PbMg1/3Nb2/3O3 relaxors is studied in (001)-, (011)-, and (111)-oriented thin films. While the different orientations of PbMg1/3Nb2/3O3 heterostructures show little variation in dielectric permittivity, a strong orientational effect is observed in BaZr0.5Ti0.5O3 heterostructures, with (111)-oriented films exhibiting a 67% higher dielectric permittivity than (001)-oriented films, a difference that is attributed to how substrate clamping along different crystallographic axes interacts with the polar-structure nucleation and growth. Measurements of dielectric anisotropy in (001)-oriented films confirm the trend-with PbMg1/3Nb2/3O3 heterostructures exhibiting just half as much anisotropy in dielectric permittivity than BaZr0.5Ti0.5O3 heterostructures. These results indicate a higher susceptibility to substrate clamping in homovalent relaxors as compared to heterovalent relaxors, implying that the random fields in the heterovalent relaxors could be advantageous for materials in such geometries and applications.

Automated summary

In this study, the impact of epitaxial constraint on the relaxor behavior and properties of thin films with different orientations was investigated. It was found that the orientation of heterostructures has a significant effect on their dielectric performance, while homovalent relaxors are more susceptible to substrate clamping. Additionally, the dielectric anisotropy was found to be lower in heterostructures compared to homovalent relaxors.