4.6 Article

Resistance-switchable conjugated polyrotaxane for flexible high-performance RRAMs

期刊

MATERIALS HORIZONS
卷 9, 期 5, 页码 1526-1535

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1mh01929e

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61704155, 31900951, 61874132]
  2. 111 project [D18023]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A representative closely packed conjugated polyrotaxane (CPR1) is synthesized by threading polyaniline (PAN) into beta-cyclodextrin (CD) macrocycles and utilized to construct an RRAM device with outstanding resistive switching capability. The CPR1 RRAM device shows remarkable nonvolatile memory performance, ultra-fast response time, excellent reliability and stability. This work demonstrates the potential of CPR materials in highly stable memory devices for next-generation flexible and wearable electronics.
A representative closely packed conjugated polyrotaxane (CPR1) is synthesized by threading polyaniline (PAN) into beta-cyclodextrin (CD) macrocycles and utilized for the first time to construct an RRAM device that exhibits an outstanding resistive switching capability. The CPR1 RRAM device displays remarkable nonvolatile memory performance with an extremely high ON/OFF ratio of 10(8), the ultra-fast response of 29 ns, excellent reliability and reproducibility, and long-term stability (more than 1 year). The mechanism underlying this resistive switching behavior is understood according to the electric-field-induced proton doping of the PAN core by the CD sheath through hydrogen bonding interactions. More impressively, the favorable solubility and intrinsic flexibility of CPR1 allow for large-scale fabrication of flexible CPR1 RRAM device arrays by full-printing technology with endurance of 1000 bending cycles at the minimum bending radius of 3 mm, higher ON/OFF ratio of 10(8), and relatively lower operating voltage of 1.8 V. This work shows the potential of CPR materials in highly stable memory devices for next-generation flexible and wearable electronics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据