4.2 Article

Genetic Analysis of Influenza A/H1N1pdm Strains Isolated in Bangladesh in Early 2020

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/tropicalmed7030038

关键词

influenza virus; HA; NA; COVID-19; Bangladesh; evolution

资金

  1. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development [JP19fm0108003, 20wm0225010h0101, 21wm0225010h0102]
  2. Osaka University ASEAN campus project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Through genetic analysis of influenza virus samples from patients in Evercare Hospital Dhaka, Bangladesh, we identified the presence of H1N1pdm influenza subtype, which had spread rapidly without acquiring oseltamivir resistance.
Influenza is one of the most common respiratory virus infections. We analyzed hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) gene segments of viruses isolated from influenza patients who visited Evercare Hospital Dhaka, Bangladesh, in early 2020 immediately before the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. All of them were influenza virus type A (IAV) H1N1pdm. Sequence analysis of the HA segments of the virus strains isolated from the clinical specimens and the subsequent phylogenic analyses of the obtained sequences revealed that all of the H1N1pdm recent subclades 6B.1A5A + 187V/A, 6B.1A5A + 156K, and 6B.1A5A + 156K with K209M were already present in Bangladesh in January 2020. Molecular clock analysis results suggested that the subclade 6B.1A5A + 156K emerged in Denmark, Australia, or the United States in July 2019, while subclades 6B.1A5A + 187V/A and 6B.1A5A + 156K with K209M emerged in East Asia in April and September 2019, respectively. On the other hand, sequence analysis of NA segments showed that the viruses lacked the H275Y mutation that confers oseltamivir resistance. Since the number of influenza cases in Bangladesh is usually small between November and January, these results indicated that the IAV H1N1pdm had spread extremely rapidly without acquiring oseltamivir resistance during a time of active international flow of people before the COVID-19 pandemic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据