4.1 Review

Current Trends in Fluid Research in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: A Review

期刊

FLUIDS
卷 7, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/fluids7030116

关键词

artificial intelligence; machine learning; fluid flows; computational fluid dynamics; fluid mechanics

资金

  1. Special Account for Research Grants of U.Th.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Computational methods in fluid research have progressed due to the incorporation of large amounts of data, and artificial intelligence and machine learning have played a significant role in fluid research by extracting information from data and converting it into knowledge. Non-linear, decision tree-based methods have shown remarkable performance in reproducing fluid properties.
Computational methods in fluid research have been progressing during the past few years, driven by the incorporation of massive amounts of data, either in textual or graphical form, generated from multi-scale simulations, laboratory experiments, and real data from the field. Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its adjacent field, Machine Learning (ML), are about to reach standardization in most fields of computational science and engineering, as they provide multiple ways for extracting information from data that turn into knowledge, with the aid of portable software implementations that are easy to adopt. There is ample information on the historical and mathematical background of all aspects of AI/ML in the literature. Thus, this review article focuses mainly on their impact on fluid research at present, highlighting advances and opportunities, recognizing techniques and methods having been proposed, tabulating, and testing some of the most popular algorithms that have shown significant accuracy and performance on fluid applications. We also investigate algorithmic accuracy on several fluid datasets that correspond to simulation results for the transport properties of fluids and suggest that non-linear, decision tree-based methods have shown remarkable performance on reproducing fluid properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据