4.6 Article

A FDEM Parametric Investigation on the Impact Fracture of Monolithic Glass

期刊

BUILDINGS
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/buildings12030271

关键词

glass; impact; fracture; parametric study; combined finite-discrete element method

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51808368]
  2. Qinglan Project of Jiangsu Province of China
  3. Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [SJCX20_1096]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the combined finite-discrete element method was used to investigate the impact failures of monolithic glass, focusing on soda-lime glass. The method accurately evaluated the contact forces and structural deformation by discretizing the glass and incorporating a finite element formulation. The results revealed the impact fracture mechanism of soda-lime glass and provided guidance for its design and manufacturing.
Due to the brittleness, monolithic glass may fracture under impact, resulting in catastrophic sequences. The combined finite-discrete element method, i.e., FDEM, is employed to investigate both the oblique and the perpendicular impact failures of monolithic glass parametrically, particularly the soda-lime glass. Using FDEM, glass is discretised into discrete elements where a finite element formulation is incorporated, leading to accurate evaluation of the contact forces and structural deformation. Following the basic theories of the FDEM, a cohesive Mode I fracture model of glass is briefly introduced. Numerical examples are given for the verification of the employed fracture model and the applicability of the FDEM, and comparisons have been made against the computational and experimental results in the literature. The investigated parameters include the impact velocity, the impact angle, the material properties of glass, etc. The obtained results not only revealed the impact fracture mechanism of soda-lime glass but also provided guidance for its design and manufacturing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据