4.4 Article

Health Technology Assessment Process for Oncology Drugs: Impact of CADTH Changes on Public Payer Reimbursement Recommendations

期刊

CURRENT ONCOLOGY
卷 29, 期 3, 页码 1514-1526

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29030127

关键词

health technology assessment; HTA oncology treatment access; quality adjusted life years; treatment access; drug access; drug reimbursement; Canadian agency for drugs and technologies in health; CADTH; pan-Canadian oncology drug review; pCODR

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Public reimbursement systems in Canada face the challenge of balancing limited resources with the provision of necessary treatments. Health technology assessment (HTA) plays a crucial role in analyzing the value of drugs and making recommendations for public reimbursement. CADTH provides recommendations to all provinces in Canada, except Quebec. Recent changes have resulted in reduced cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) threshold, leading to greater price reductions in drug recommendations to provinces.
Public reimbursement systems face the challenge of balancing provision of needed treatments and the reality of limited resources. Canada has a complex system for drug approval and public reimbursement, with jurisdiction divided between the federal government and the provinces/territories. A pivotal role is that of health technology assessment (HTA), which relies primarily on health economic principles to analyze the value of drugs on a population health basis and make recommendations about public reimbursement. The Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) provides recommendations to all provinces but Quebec. This article provides an overview of Canada's approval and public reimbursement pathway, including the role of HTA and the economic principles on which it relies. Starting in late 2020, CADTH reduced the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) threshold, the metric relied upon in making recommendations to public payers. An analysis of all 56 oncology drug final recommendations issued from January 2020 to January 2022 was conducted and confirms this reduction in the cost per QALY threshold. As a result of this threshold reduction, recommendations to the provinces include, in a number of cases, substantially greater price reductions. The potential implications for successful price negotiation with the pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance (pCPA), the public negotiating body for the provinces, are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据