4.7 Article

Packaging Design to Protect Hongmeiren Orange Fruit from Mechanical Damage during Simulated and Road Transportation

期刊

HORTICULTURAE
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/horticulturae8030258

关键词

citrus; mechanical damage; transportation; packaging; temperature

资金

  1. Zhejiang Provincial Key R&D Program of China [2019C02074]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [K20210202]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a new packaging format (Packaging C) for Hongmeiren oranges, which utilizes plastic partition boards to prevent fruit damage and decay. The results demonstrate that Packaging C significantly reduces damage and decay rates compared to other packaging formats. Additionally, Packaging C can also prevent dents on the peel of large fruits.
Hongmeiren is a high-quality orange fruit but susceptible to mechanical damage. This work proposes a new packaging format (Packaging C), which used the plastic partition boards to separate the folding plastic basket to avoid the fruits from crushing each other, and used a PU foam layer and placed it along the inside of the EPE foam layer to meet the different sizes of fruits. The results show that under both 3 and 10 h of simulated transportation, Packaging C achieved a much lower damage and decay rates than Packaging A (plastic bulk containers), and this was further verified by the road transportation. Besides, Packaging C could avoid dents in the peel of some large fruits compared to the gift packaging (Packaging B). Although the use of inner packaging could increase the use of packaging, it can reduce the waste of cultivation and transportation resources caused by not being able to deliver the fruit to the consumer, as well as environmental pollution caused by fruit decay. Moreover, low temperature (10 degrees C) and high humidity (90% RH) during transportation could further reduce the damage and packages at the rear position obtained a higher damage rate than at the front position, but no obvious difference was found between stack heights.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据