4.7 Article

The Preparation and Properties of Composite Hydrogels Based on Gelatin and (3-Aminopropyl) Trimethoxysilane Grafted Cellulose Nanocrystals Covalently Linked with Microbial Transglutaminase

期刊

GELS
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/gels8030146

关键词

gelatin-based composite hydrogels; cellulose nanocrystals; silanization; mechanical property; microbial transglutaminase

资金

  1. Major projects of tackling key industrial of Shandong's Newtraditional Kinetic Energy Conversion
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2020QB183]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mechanically enhanced gelatin-based composite hydrogels were developed using functionalized cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) and microbial transglutaminase (mTG) as a binding agent, resulting in significantly improved mechanical properties and thermo-stability. The biocompatibility of the hydrogels was evaluated and showed no obvious inhibitory effect on cell proliferation, indicating great potential for biomedical applications.
Mechanically enhanced gelatin-based composite hydrogels were developed in the presence of functionalized cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) employing microbial transglutaminase (mTG) as a binding agent. In this work, the surfaces of CNCs were grafted with (3-Aminopropyl) trimethoxysilane with a NH2 functional group, and the success of CNCs' modification was verified by FTIR spectroscopy and XPS. The higher degree of modification in CNCs resulted in more covalent cross-linking and dispersibility within the gelatin matrix; thus, the as-prepared hydrogels showed significantly improved mechanical properties and thermo-stability, as revealed by dynamic rheological analysis, uniaxial compression tests and SEM. The biocompatibility of the obtained hydrogels was evaluated by the MTT method, and it was found that the grafted CNCs had no obvious inhibitory effect on cell proliferation. Hence, the mechanically enhanced gelatin-based hydrogels might have great potential in biomedical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据