3.8 Proceedings Paper

A Two-Stage Method to Solve Location-Routing Problems Based on Sectorization

期刊

INNOVATIONS IN INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 148-159

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG SINGAPORE PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-78170-5_14

关键词

Location-routing problems; Sectorization; Multi-objective optimization; Two-stage method; NSGA-II; Pareto optimality

资金

  1. ERDF -European Regional Development Fund through the Operational Programme for Competitiveness and Internationalisation -COMPETE 2020 Programme
  2. Portuguese funding agency, FCT Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-031671]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a new two-stage solution method for solving multi-objective location-routing problems. It assigns customers to distribution centres using the concept of sectorization and determines routes for each sector to meet customer demands. The effectiveness of this method is demonstrated by comparing the results with those obtained using NSGA-II.
This paper deals with multi-objective location-routing problems involving distribution centres and a set of customers. It proposes a new two-stage solution method that comprehends the concept of sectorization. Distribution centres are opened, and the corresponding opening cost is calculated. A subset of customers is assigned to each of them and, in this way, sectors are formed. The objective functions in assigning customers to distribution centres are the total deviation in demands of sectors and the total deviation in total distance of customers from centroid of sectors, which must be minimized Afterward, a route is determined for each sector to meet the demands of customers. At this stage, the objective function is the total distance on the routes in the sectors, that must be minimized Benchmarks are defined for the problem and the results acquired with the two-stage method are compared to those obtained with NSGA-II. It is observed that NSGA-II can achieve many non-dominated solutions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据