4.6 Article

Barriers to BIM-Based Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment for Buildings: An Interpretive Structural Modelling Approach

期刊

BUILDINGS
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/buildings12030324

关键词

barriers; BIM; interpretive structural modelling; life cycle; sustainability; ISM; MICMAC

资金

  1. Centre of Applied Research and Innovation in the Built Environment (CARINBE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the interrelatedness of the barriers to integrating BIM in buildings sustainability assessment using the interpretive structural modelling approach. The categorization of adoption barriers through the MICMAC analysis allows for discussions on the challenges of BIM-based life cycle assessment and the development of policies and design decisions to drive the process further.
With the emergence of Building Information Modelling (BIM) as central to construction design, planning, execution and maintenance, integration into the entire infrastructure sustainability process is imperative for achieving sustainable development. Despite its immense benefit of aiding compliance to sustainable construction, potential barriers continue to widen the gap in implementation. Therefore, this study adopts the interpretive structural modelling approach to advance a ranked structure of the interrelatedness of the barriers to integrating BIM in buildings sustainability assessment. The Matrice d'Impacts croises-multipication applique a classement analysis (MICMAC) was utilised to categorise the identified adoption barriers in the model. The identified barriers and relationship with themselves are valuable in discussing the challenges to BIM-based LCA and developing policies and design decisions to drive the process further. Further, it adds to the emerging discussion of BIM from the life cycle sustainability assessment perspective for infrastructure. The findings are critical for policy, stakeholders and extending the body of knowledge.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据