3.8 Article

Unexpected Vection Exacerbates Cybersickness During HMD-Based Virtual Reality

期刊

FRONTIERS IN VIRTUAL REALITY
卷 3, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/frvir.2022.860919

关键词

cybersickness; motion sickness; virtual reality; head-mounted display (HMD); vection

资金

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) Discovery Project [DP210101475]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the possibility that unexpected visual-induced illusions of self-motion can cause cybersickness. The results showed that unexpected vection is the most important predictor of cybersickness, suggesting that developers should ensure that simulated self-motions are expected and perceived to be under user control in order to safely enhance experiences in HMD VR.
Visually induced illusions of self-motion (vection) are thought to cause cybersickness during head-mounted display based virtual reality (HMD VR). However, the empirical support for this widespread belief is rather mixed. Our exploratory study examined the possibility that only unexpected experiences of vection provoke cybersickness. Fifteen males and 15 females played an HMD VR game (Mission: ISS) for up to 14 min with: 1) their experiences of vection and cybersickness assessed every 2 minutes; and 2) the game being terminated whenever they reported feeling sick. Of the 30 participants tested, 17 reported feeling sick and 13 remained well. Sick and well participants did not differ in terms of the strength of their vection experiences. However, the sick participants were significantly more likely to report unexpected/uncontrolled vection. When these data were subjected to machine learning analysis, unexpected vection was found to be the most important predictor of cybersickness. These preliminary findings suggest that vection can be used to safely enhance experiences in HMD VR-as long as developers ensure that any simulated self-motions are expected and perceived to be under the user's control.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据