4.1 Article

Dynamic Viscoelasticity and Surface Properties of Porcine Left Anterior Descending Coronary Arteries

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13239-016-0288-4

关键词

Coronary arteries; Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA); Loss; Storage; Surface roughness; Viscoelasticity

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council scholarship [M114612B]
  2. Arthritis Research UK Grant [H0671]
  3. Innovation and Research Award from the Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [1377181] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was, for the first time, to measure and compare quantitatively the viscoelastic properties and surface roughness of coronary arteries. Porcine left anterior descending coronary arteries were dissected ex vivo. Viscoelastic properties were measured longitudinally using dynamic mechanical analysis, for a range of frequencies from 0.5 to 10 Hz. Surface roughness was calculated following three-dimensional reconstructed of surface images obtained using an optical microscope. Storage modulus ranged from 14.47 to 25.82 MPa, and was found to be frequency-dependent, decreasing as the frequency increased. Storage was greater than the loss modulus, with the latter found to be frequency-independent with a mean value of 2.10 +/- 0.33 MPa. The circumferential surface roughness was significantly greater (p < 0.05) than the longitudinal surface roughness, ranging from 0.73 to 2.83 and 0.35 to 0.92 mu m, respectively. However, if surface roughness values were corrected for shrinkage during processing, circumferential and longitudinal surface roughness were not significantly different (1.04 +/- 0.47, 0.89 +/- 0.27 mu m, respectively; p > 0.05). No correlation was found between the viscoelastic properties and surface roughness. It is feasible to quantitatively measure the viscoelastic properties of coronary arteries and the roughness of their endothelial surface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据