3.8 Article

Meeting in the Middle: Towards Successful Multidisciplinary Bioimage Analysis Collaboration

期刊

FRONTIERS IN BIOINFORMATICS
卷 2, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fbinf.2022.889755

关键词

computational science; bioimage analysis; collaboration; guide; multidisciplinary

资金

  1. AS was funded by the Morgridge Institute for Research. WA was funded by ASEE NDSEG Fellowship, Vanderbilt TIPS BIOMIID Program, and AFOSR FA9550-17-1-0374. RH was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany
  2. Morgridge Institute for Research - ASEE NDSEG Fellowship
  3. Vanderbilt TIPS BIOMIID Program [FA9550-17-1-0374]
  4. AFOSR
  5. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) - Morgridge Institute for Research and Humboldt Foundation [P41-GM135019-01]
  6. NIH [GR001208, BB/S010386/1]
  7. Moorfields Eye Charity Springboard award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the increase in subject knowledge expertise, experts from different fields need to collaborate to address complex issues. This guide uses bioimage analysis as a showcase to provide a framework for cross-disciplinary work, discussing considerations and best practices for collaboration.
With an increase in subject knowledge expertise required to solve specific biological questions, experts from different fields need to collaborate to address increasingly complex issues. To successfully collaborate, everyone involved in the collaboration must take steps to meet in the middle. We thus present a guide on truly cross-disciplinary work using bioimage analysis as a showcase, where it is required that the expertise of biologists, microscopists, data analysts, clinicians, engineers, and physicists meet. We discuss considerations and best practices from the perspective of both users and technology developers, while offering suggestions for working together productively and how this can be supported by institutes and funders. Although this guide uses bioimage analysis as an example, the guiding principles of these perspectives are widely applicable to other cross-disciplinary work.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据