4.6 Review

Biomarkers of dietary patterns: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

期刊

NUTRITION REVIEWS
卷 80, 期 8, 页码 1856-1895

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/nutrit/nuac009

关键词

biological markers; biomarker; dietary assessment; dietary pattern

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most methods for assessing dietary intake have measurement errors. Dietary biomarkers are objective tools for dietary assessment, but biomarkers of dietary patterns have not been well described. Future work should validate novel biomarkers that indicate specific dietary patterns.
Context Most methods for assessing dietary intake have considerable measurement error. Dietary biomarkers are objective tools for dietary assessment. Dietary biomarkers of dietary patterns have not been well described, despite modern dietary guidelines endorsing dietary patterns. Objective This systematic review sought to describe the dietary biomarkers commonly used to assess dietary patterns, and the novel biomarkers of dietary patterns identified by exploratory studies. Data Sources MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central, PreMEDLINE, and CINAHL databases were searched. Data Extraction Data extraction and bias assessment were undertaken in duplicate. Data Analysis A qualitative approach was applied, without statistical analysis. Conclusion In controlled settings, dietary biomarkers of single nutrients or of individual foods or food groups are commonly used to assess compliance with dietary patterns. However, currently, there are no dietary biomarkers or biomarker profiles that are able to identify the specific dietary pattern that has been consumed by an individual. Future work should seek to validate novel dietary biomarkers and biomarker profiles that are indicative of specific dietary patterns and their characteristics. A dietary biomarker panel consisting of multiple biomarkers is almost certainly necessary to capture the complexity of dietary patterns. Systematic Review Registration PROSPERO registration no. CRD42019129839.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据