4.7 Article

High-Integrity Sequencing of Spike Gene for SARS-CoV-2 Variant Determination

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23063257

关键词

SARS-CoV-2; variant; spike gene; nanopore sequencing

资金

  1. National Health Research Institutes [PH-110-PP-05, PH-111-PP-05]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The widely used amplicon-based approach for SARS-CoV-2 genome sequencing has limitations, including low sequence coverage and high resource requirements. To address these issues, the researchers proposed a single PCR method to efficiently detect spike gene mutations and developed a bioinformatic protocol for accurate variant calling of spike protein. Their approach showed high detection rates and robustness against different sequencing datasets.
For tiling of the SARS-CoV-2 genome, the ARTIC Network provided a V4 protocol using 99 pairs of primers for amplicon production and is currently the widely used amplicon-based approach. However, this technique has regions of low sequence coverage and is labour-, time-, and cost-intensive. Moreover, it requires 14 pairs of primers in two separate PCRs to obtain spike gene sequences. To overcome these disadvantages, we proposed a single PCR to efficiently detect spike gene mutations. We proposed a bioinformatic protocol that can process FASTQ reads into spike gene consensus sequences to accurately call spike protein variants from sequenced samples or to fairly express the cases of missing amplicons. We evaluated the in silico detection rate of primer sets that yield amplicon sizes of 400, 1200, and 2500 bp for spike gene sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 to be 59.49, 76.19, and 92.20%, respectively. The in silico detection rate of our proposed single PCR primers was 97.07%. We demonstrated the robustness of our analytical protocol against 3000 Oxford Nanopore sequencing runs of distinct datasets, thus ensuring high-integrity sequencing of spike genes for variant SARS-CoV-2 determination. Our protocol works well with the data yielded from versatile primer designs, making it easy to determine spike protein variants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据