4.7 Review

Photoelectrocatalytic hydrogen peroxide production based on transition-metal-oxide semiconductors

期刊

CHINESE JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
卷 43, 期 5, 页码 1204-1215

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(21)64028-7

关键词

Hydrogen peroxide; Solar fuel; Photoelectrocatalysis; Transition-metal-oxide semiconductor; Fuel cell

资金

  1. Australian Research Council through its DECRA [DE210100930, DP200101900, FL190100139]
  2. Research Donation Generic from the Faculty of Engineering, Architecture and Information Technology, The University of Queensland [2020003431]
  3. Australian Research Council [DP200101900, FL190100139, DE210100930] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents the latest progress and challenges in the photoelectrocatalytic production of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) as a renewable fuel, as well as discusses future perspectives.
As a kind of valuable chemicals, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) has aroused growing attention in many fields. However, H2O2 production via traditional anthraquinone process suffers from challenges of large energy consumption and heavy carbon footprint. Alternatively, photoelectrocatalytic (PEC) production of H2O2 has shown great promises to make H2O2 a renewable fuel to store solar energy. Transition-metal-oxide (TMO) semiconductor based photoelectrocatalysts are among the most promising candidates for PEC H2O2 production. In this work, the fundamentals of H2O2 synthesis through PEC process are briefly introduced, followed by the state-of-the-art of TMO semiconductor based photoelectrocatalysts for PEC production H2O2. Then, the progress on H2O2 fuel cells from on-site PEC production is presented. Furthermore, the challenges and future perspectives of PEC H2O2 production are discussed. This review aims to provide inspiration for the PEC production of H2O2 as a renewable solar fuel. (C) 2022, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据