4.5 Article

Smart erythrocyte-hitchhiking insulin delivery system for prolonged automatic blood glucose control

期刊

BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 10, 期 10, 页码 2638-2649

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2bm00280a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Regional Innovation and Development Joint Fund [U20A20411]
  2. National Science Fund for Excellent Young Scholars [82022070]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By using the erythrocyte-hitchhiking strategy, the blood circulation time of an insulin delivery system was significantly prolonged, allowing for long-term and automatic blood glucose control in diabetic patients. This approach shows great potential for future development due to its versatility and ability to interact with other substances.
Long and automatic control of blood glucose levels in diabetic patients could solve the problems caused by frequent insulin injections. Herein, we exploited the protection potential of erythrocytes by a hitchhiking strategy to significantly prolong the blood circulation time of a specifically-designed smart hitchhiking insulin delivery system (SHIDS). In the SHIDS, insulin, glucose oxidase, and catalase were co-loaded into nanoparticles formed by modified chitosan. The free glucosamines in chitosan anchor glucose transporters on the surface of erythrocytes, allowing erythrocyte-hitchhiking in the blood flow. A high glucose level triggers quick insulin release from the SHIDS to reduce the glucose level, which then slows the insulin release. This closed-loop glucose regulation by the SHIDS effectively controlled blood glucose within the normal range for at least 24 h and under 250 mg dL(-1) for similar to 48 h with one injection. This injectable erythrocyte-hitchhiking nanoplatform, which achieves long-term and automatic blood glucose control, thus has potential for further development. As the carrier could be used for delivering other drugs/agents or interacting with other substances, the hitchhiking strategy is versatile and may be applied in other medical applications too.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据