4.2 Article

Searching for better X-ray and γ-ray photodetectors: structure-composition properties of the TlPb2Br5-xIx quaternary system

期刊

MATERIALS ADVANCES
卷 3, 期 9, 页码 4006-4014

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1ma01259b

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Poland [16.16.160.557]
  2. Swiss National Science foundation via an Ambizione Fellowship [161249]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study presents a method to search for new detector materials by combining binary photodetector compounds. A new solid solution was discovered in the TlPb2Br5-xIx compositions and a high-quality standardized structure file was prepared through thorough crystallographic analysis. In addition, the phase diagram of the TlPb2Br5-'TlPb2I5' section was completed based on 21 alloys.
Developing X-ray and gamma-ray detectors with stable operation at ambient temperature and high energy resolution is an open challenge. Here, we present an approach to search for new detector materials, combining binary photodetector compounds. More specifically, we explore quaternary TlPb2Br5-xIx compositions, relying on materials synergy between TlBr, TlI, and PbI2 photodetectors. We discover a broad solid solution in the TlPb2Br5-'TlPb2I5' section, which can be derived from a new quaternary compound, TlPb2BrI4, by partial substitution of Br by I atoms on the 4c site or by replacement of I by Br atoms on the 16l site. We carry out a thorough crystallographic analysis of the new TlPb2BrI4 compound and prepare a high-quality standardized structure file. We also complete the phase diagram of the TlPb2Br5-'TlPb2I5' section, based on 21 alloys. Furthermore, we synthesize a series of high quality centimeter-sized TlPb2Br5-xIx single crystals (x = 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5) by the Bridgman-Stockbarger method and study their structure and properties using a combination of experimental techniques (X-ray diffraction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and absorption spectroscopy) and theoretical calculations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据