4.7 Article

Ultra-small UiO-66-NH2 nanoparticles immobilized on g-C3N4 nanosheets for enhanced catalytic activity

期刊

GREEN ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT
卷 7, 期 3, 页码 512-518

出版社

KEAI PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gee.2020.10.023

关键词

UiO-66-NH2; g-C3N4; Unsaturated coordination positions; Lewis acidity; Meerwein-Ponndorf-Verley reaction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21525316, 21673254]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2017YFA0403003]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences [QYZDY-SSW-SLH013]
  4. Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission [Z191100007219009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, ultra-small UiO-66-NH2 nanoparticles with a size of 8-15 nm were successfully synthesized and found to have more unsaturated coordination positions and increased Lewis acidity. Compared to larger particles synthesized using traditional methods, these ultra-small nanoparticles exhibit improved catalytic activity in the Meerwein-Ponndorf-Verley reaction.
UiO-66-NH2, an important metal-organic framework, is usually synthesized by solvothermal method and the particle size is generally larger than 200 nm, which limits its catalytic applications in chemical reactions. It is very meaningful to produce UiO-66-NH2 nanoparticles with ultra-small size, but remains challenging. Herein, we synthesized UiO-66-NH2 nanoparticles in size of 8-15 nm that are immobilized on g-C3N4 nanosheets. Compared with the UiO-66-NH2 synthesized by the traditional solvothermal method (> 200 nm), the ultra-small UiO-66-NH2 nanoparticles immobilized on g-C3N4 have more unsaturated coordination positions and increased Lewis acidity. Owing to these combined advantages, the ultra-small UiO-66-NH2 nanoparticles exhibit greatly improved catalytic activity for Meerwein-Ponndorf-Verley reaction than larger UiO-66-NH2 particles. (C) 2020 Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据