4.7 Article

The importance of local scale for assessing, monitoring and predicting of air quality in urban areas

期刊

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
卷 26, 期 -, 页码 150-160

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2016.06.001

关键词

Integrated planning; Neighbourhood scale; PM10 removal; Street trees; Urban ecology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The importance of the spatial scale for counteracting urban air pollution is highlighted in this work. In particular, the concept of Environmental Areas is used here in a wider sense than the current one. The Environmental Area is an area where the traffic conditions are more favourable for walkability and cycling compared to those of private motor vehicles. This work extends this concept to integrate several approaches coming from dimensional analysis, ecology, urban planning and transport engineering, to define a suitable spatial scale for an estimation of the PM10 removal through the street trees. Results highlight that, within the monitored area (the Monteverde neighbourhood, Rome Italy), the street trees are able to remove 0.142 t ha(-1) year(-1) of PM10 (about the 57% of the total particulate emission) with a re-suspension from plant canopies of 4%. Results have also demonstrated how is important an effective management of trees and the choice of appropriate trees made in according to the leaves' characteristics but also related to urban context in which trees are placed. We highlight that integrated planning among different elements of the public urban space is of great importance for ameliorating the urban liveability. Moreover, we remark that this Environmental Areas-based approach contributes to promote in citizens a greater knowledge of the territory and awareness of the dynamics that affect it and consequently a wider participation to public decisions concerning the choice, implementation and management of the street trees, reduction of car-based mobility and increase of pedestrian and cyclist mobility. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据