4.7 Article

Cluster analysis of urban water supply and demand: Toward large-scale comparative sustainability planning

期刊

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
卷 27, 期 -, 页码 484-496

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2016.06.003

关键词

Cluster analysis; Comparative methods; Sustainable urban water systems; Water budget; Water use

资金

  1. Ramboll Foundation
  2. Liveable Cities Lab for a research project on Enhancing Blue-Green Infrastructure and Social Performance in High Density Urban Environments

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The sustainability of urban water systems is often compared in small numbers of cases selected as much for their familiarity as for their similarities and differences. Few studies examine large urban datasets to conduct comparisons that identify unexpected similarities and differences among urban water systems and problems. This research analyzed a dataset of 142 cities that includes annual per capita water use (m(3)/yrIcap) and population. It added a 0.5 degrees grid annual water budget value (P-PET/yr) as an index of hydroclimatic water supply. With these indices of urban water supply and demand, we conducted a hierarchical cluster analysis to identify relative similarities among, and distances between, the 142 cases. While some expected groupings of climatically similar cities were identified, unexpected clusters were also identified, e.g., cities that use water at greater rates than local climatic water budgets provide. Those cities must seek water from greater distances and greater depths. They face greater water and wastewater treatment costs. To become more sustainable they must increase water use efficiency, demand management, reuse, and recycling. The significance of the population variable suggests that adding other explanatory socio-economic variables, as well as more precise water system indices, are logical next steps for comparative analysis of urban water sustainability. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据