4.6 Article

Enhanced ethopabate adsorption in monodispersed porous carbon derived from zeolitic imidazolate framework-8

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 46, 期 17, 页码 8224-8231

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2nj00843b

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21665006]
  2. Natural Science Foundation from Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region [2020GXNSFDA297025]
  3. Guangxi Science and Technology Base and Special Fund for Talents [2021AC19390]
  4. Foundation of Guilin University of Technology [RD2100001775]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A convenient, sustainable, and efficient method for the fabrication of monodispersed porous carbon material was developed, improving the adsorption capacity of solid phase extraction columns and playing a crucial role in sample pretreatment.
The improvement of the adsorption performance of adsorbents to the target substance plays a crucial role in the actual sample pretreatment. Here, a convenient, sustainable and efficient strategy was developed for the fabrication of the monodispersed porous carbon material. It was derived from the direct carbonization of zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 (ZIF-8) with controllable pore size and uniform morphology without any additional carbon source. The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area of carbonized ZIF-8 (C/ZIF-8) was as high as 1463.20 m(2) g(-1) and pore volume was 0.5608 cm(3) g(-1), and the adsorption capacity of the C/ZIF-8-based solid phase extraction (SPE) column greatly enhanced to 640.88 mu g g(-1) compared with the adsorption capacity (93.36 mu g g(-1)) of original ZIF-8 towards ethopabate (ETP), achieving an improvement of about 7 times. Highly efficient ETP extraction was achieved with C/ZIF-8 under pH 3.0-7.0 for 16 min, and nearly 100% desorption efficiency was obtained when eluted with methanol for 12 min. The ETP enrichment on C/ZIF-8 and coupled with the high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) detection provided a feasible method for the analysis of ETP in chicken samples. The recovery and the relative standard deviation of the method were 89.66-99.58% and 0.31-1.77%, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据