4.0 Article

Assessing the Hydropower Potential Using Hydrological Models and Geospatial Tools in the White Bandama Watershed (Cote d'Ivoire, West Africa)

期刊

FRONTIERS IN WATER
卷 4, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/frwa.2022.844934

关键词

hydrological modeling; hydropower potential; GIS; SWAT; White Bandama Watershed; West Africa; hydropower

资金

  1. IRD (Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement, France) [UMR IGE Imputation 252RA5]
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [400914/00]
  3. [252RA5]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assessed the hydropower potential at the White Bandama Watershed in Cote d'Ivoire using a hydrological model and Geographic Information System. It identified 22 potential hydropower sites with an estimated capacity of 538.56 MW.
An assessment of hydropower potential at the watershed scale was conducted at the White Bandama Watershed (WBW) in Cote d'Ivoire (West Africa). The method used involves the application of a hydrological model [Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT)] coupled with a Quantum Geographic Information System (QGIS), denoted as QSWAT, to assess the water resource availability and hydropower potential of streams and determine potential hydropower sites for future hydropower development in the watershed. Geospatial data about the topography, soil types, land use/land cover, weather, and discharge were considered in hydrological and hydro-geomorphological characterization of the watershed. Streamflow and climate data-enabled model operation and simulation of the hydrology of the watershed. The model performance and robustness were confirmed with the p-factor, r-factor, coefficient of determination R-2, and Nash-Sutcliffe (NS) efficiency coefficient. The hydropower potential of streams was evaluated by considering the simulated streamflow and water head. A total of 22 future hydropower sites was identified, geolocated, and classified with an estimated total production capacity of 538.56 MW.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据