4.7 Article Data Paper

Spatial and seasonal patterns of water isotopes in northeastern German lakes

期刊

EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE DATA
卷 14, 期 4, 页码 1857-1867

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/essd-14-1857-2022

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Ai 134/3-1]
  2. Leibniz Association [K45/2017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Water stable isotopes (δO-18 and δH-2) in lakes and riverine systems in northeastern Germany were analyzed throughout 2020. The dataset includes samples collected at lake shores, buoys, selected spots in lakes, and the outflow of Muggelsee. The analysis provides information on the vegetation period, seasonal isotope amplitude, and spatial isotope variability in different branches of the riverine systems.
Water stable isotopes (delta O-18 and delta H-2) were analyzed in samples collected in lakes, associated with riverine systems in northeastern Germany, throughout 2020. The dataset (Aichner et al., 2021; https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.935633) is derived from water samples collected at (a) lake shores (sampled in March and July 2020), (b) buoys which were temporarily installed in deep parts of the lake (sampled monthly from March to October 2020), (c) multiple spatially distributed spots in four selected lakes (in September 2020), and (d) the outflow of Muggelsee (sampled biweekly from March 2020 to January 2021). At shores, water was sampled with a pipette from 40-60 cm below the water surface and directly transferred into a measurement vial, while at buoys a Limnos water sampler was used to obtain samples from 1 m below the surface. Isotope analysis was conducted at IGB Berlin, using a Picarro L2130-i cavity ring-down spectrometer, with a measurement uncertainty of < 0.15 parts per thousand (delta O-18) and < 0.0 parts per thousand (delta H-2). The data give information about the vegetation period and the full seasonal isotope amplitude in the sampled lakes and about spatial isotope variability in different branches of the associated riverine systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据