4.6 Article

Embedding entropy: a nonlinear measure of dynamical causality

期刊

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2021.0766

关键词

dynamical causality; embedding entropy; causality strength; Granger causality; non-separability problem; delay-embedding theorem

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research on causality has a long history and different concepts and computational methods have been developed. This study presents a unified mathematical framework for dynamical causality (DC) and proposes causality criteria called embedding entropy (EE) and conditional embedding entropy (cEE). EE and cEE have significant advantages in nonlinear causal inference and reducing scale bias in numerical calculations, and their effectiveness has been demonstrated through simulations and real-world datasets.
Research on concepts and computational methods of causality has a long history, and there are various concepts of causality as well as corresponding computing algorithms based on measured data. Here, by considering causes and effects from a dynamical perspective, we present a unified mathematical framework for the so-called dynamical causality (DC), which can detect causal interactions over time; notably, this framework covers Granger causality, transfer entropy, embedding causality and their conditional versions. Based on this framework, we further propose a causality criterion called embedding entropy (EE) to measure the DC between two variables. Moreover, its conditional version, conditional embedding entropy (cEE), is also derived for detecting conditional/direct causality. The significant advantages of EE and cEE are that they can be employed for solving not only nonlinear causal inference but also the non-separability problem, and they can reduce the scale bias in numerical calculation. The performance and robustness of EE and cEE were demonstrated through numerical simulations, and causal inference on various real-world datasets validated their effectiveness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据