4.5 Article

Thermodynamics of partonic matter in relativistic heavy-ion collisions from a multiphase transport model

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW C
卷 105, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.105.034912

关键词

-

资金

  1. Na-tional Natural Science Foundation of China [12147101, 11961131011, 11890710, 11890714, 11835002]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Pro-gram of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB34030000]
  3. Guangdong Major Project of Basic and Applied Basic Research [2020B0301030008]
  4. National Science Foundation [PHY-2012947]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11775041 (W.-j.F.)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we use the string melting version of a multiphase transport model to investigate the evolution of thermodynamic properties of the central cell of parton matter produced in Au + Au collisions. By calculating the temperature and chemical potentials, we find that the trajectories of these properties depend on various physical factors, particularly the finite nuclear thickness at lower energies. However, partial thermalization is achieved when the partonic systems reach the predicted QCD phase boundary, as indicated by the evolution of pressure anisotropy.
Using the string melting version of a multiphase transport model, we focus on the evolution of thermodynamic properties of the central cell of parton matter produced in Au + Au collisions ranging from 200 GeV down to 2.7 GeV. The temperature and chemical potentials have been calculated based on both Boltzmann and quantum statistics in order to locate their evolution trajectories in the QCD phase diagram. We demonstrate that the trajectories can depend on many physical factors, especially the finite nuclear thickness at lower energies. However, from the evolution of pressure anisotropy, only partial thermalization can be achieved when the partonic systems reach the predicted QCD phase boundary. It provides some helpful insights to studying the QCD phase structure through relativistic heavy-ion collisions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据