3.8 Proceedings Paper

Preparation and characterization of silk fibroin-polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) blend films for food packaging materials

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS
卷 55, 期 -, 页码 194-200

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.034

关键词

Silk fibroin; Structural properties; Mechanical properties; Thermal properties; Surface morphology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research work characterizes blend films made by mixing silk fibroin (SF) and Poly Vinyl Alcohol (PVA), and demonstrates their potential use in the food-packaging industry. The blend films show improved physical and thermal properties compared to pure silk fibroin films, and exhibit good miscibility between SF and PVA molecules. They have the potential to serve as flexible and thermally stable materials for food packaging.
The present research work deals with the characterization of blend films obtained by mixing silk fibroin (SF) [Bombyx mori CSR4] and Poly Vinyl Alcohol (PVA) in various proportions, considering its potential applicability in the food-packaging industry. The structural, chemical, mechanical and thermal property as well as surface morphologies of blend films were investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform InfraRed spectroscopy, universal testing machine, thermogravimetric analysis, differential scanning calorimetry and scanning electron microscope. The SEM results clearly show the proper misci-bility of SF and PVA molecules to give a uniform nice surface to the blend films. The physical and thermal properties of the blend films are enhanced significantly compared to the pure silk fibroin films, with more than 100 percentage elongation at break for few blend films. The SF-PVA blend films are more flexible and thermally stable, and hence a good candidate for food packaging material.Copyright (c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the 9th National Conference on Condensed Matter Physics and Applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据