4.0 Article

Mycoplasma maculosum and Mycoplasma spumans associated with fertility disorders in dogs from a Bernese Mountain dog kennel

期刊

REVISTA ARGENTINA DE MICROBIOLOGIA
卷 54, 期 1, 页码 39-42

出版社

ASOCIACION ARGENTINA MICROBIOLOGIA
DOI: 10.1016/j.ram.2021.04.001

关键词

Dogs; Fertility disorders; Urogenital tract; Mycoplasma maculosum; Mycoplasma spumans; Antibiotic treatment

资金

  1. FONCyT-ANPCyT-MinCyT, Republica Argentina [PICT 02148/2018, PPI 2019-2021 SeCyT-UNRC]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study describes a case of subfertility and other anomalies in a Bernese Mountain Dog kennel, which were associated with the presence of Mycoplasma spumans and Mycoplasma maculosum. Successful pregnancies were achieved and fertility problems were reversed after treatment with antibiotics.
The aim of this short communication is to describe a case of subfertility and other anomalies associated with the presence of Mycoplasma spumans and Mycoplasma maculosum in a Bernese Mountain Dog kennel. After the arrival of two dogs from abroad, some fertility disorders, such as unsuccessful mating, pregnancy losses and abnormal sperm analysis results, were observed. Two consecutive samplings (vaginal swabs) of three and two bitches with prob-lems, respectively, were performed and M. spumans and M. maculosum were identified by PCR and sequencing. After treatment for 15 days with doxycycline and 9 days with azithromycin, successful pregnancies were achieved and the results of the sperm analyses were reversed. Considering that no other infectious agents causing subfertility problems were detected and that no management measures or other medication apart from these antibiotics were applied, it was concluded that fertility problems were due to the presence of these two Mycoplasma species. (c) 2021 Asociacion Argentina de Microbiologia. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据