4.6 Review

Applications of catalysis in hydroboration of imines, nitriles, and carbodiimides

期刊

ORGANIC & BIOMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY
卷 20, 期 18, 页码 3675-3702

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2ob00162d

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [OAC-1934725]
  2. Welch Foundation [23B571 (MF/ARB)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The catalytic hydroboration of imines, nitriles, and carbodiimides is an important method for synthesizing key intermediates in the production of valuable products. The use of precious metals and harsh reaction conditions in initial studies has been replaced by the use of base metals, main group elements, and milder reaction conditions in recent advancements. This review categorizes the metal and nonmetal catalyzed hydroboration of these unsaturated organic molecules into precious metals, base metals, and main group catalysts, and provides a summary of the TON and TOF of imine hydroboration catalysts, as well as recent progress in the field.
The catalytic hydroboration of imines, nitriles, and carbodiimides is a powerful method of preparing amines which are key synthetic intermediates in the synthesis of many value-added products. Imine hydroboration has perennially featured in notable reports while nitrile and carbodiimide hydroboration have gained attention recently. Initial developments in catalytic hydroboration of imines and nitriles employed precious metals and typically required harsh reaction conditions. More recent advances have shifted toward the use of base metal and main group element catalysis and milder reaction conditions. In this survey, we review metal and nonmetal catalyzed hydroboration of these unsaturated organic molecules and group them into three distinct categories: precious metals, base metals, and main group catalysts. The TON and TOF of imine hydroboration catalysts are reported and summarized with a brief overview of recent advances in the field. Mechanistic and kinetic studies of some of these protocols are also presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据