4.4 Article

Acute-Phase Initiation of Cardiac Rehabilitation for Short-Term Improvement in Activities of Daily Living in Patients Hospitalized for Acute Heart Failure

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcdd9040097

关键词

cardiac rehabilitation; acute heart failure; early rehabilitation; activities of daily living

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP21H03309, JP20H03907, JP21H03159, JP21K08123]
  2. Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare Japan [21AA2007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acute-phase cardiac rehabilitation may lead to short-term improvement in activities of daily living in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure.
Background: Whether acute-phase cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is beneficial for short-term improvement in activities of daily living (ADL) in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure (AHF) remains unclear. Aim: To investigate the association of acute-phase initiation of CR with short-term improvement in ADL in patients hospitalized for AHF. Methods: We retrospectively analyze data from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination Database, a nationwide inpatient database. Patients hospitalized for HF between January 2010 and March 2018 are included. Propensity score matching and generalized linear models are built to examine the association between improvement in ADL and acute-phase CR initiation, defined as the initiation of CR within two days of admission. Results: Among 306,826 eligible patients, CR is initiated in 45,428 patients (14.8%) within two days of hospital admission. Propensity score matching creates 45,427 pairs. CR initiation within two days of hospital admission is associated with ADL improvement (risk ratio: 1.018; 95% confidence interval: 1.004-1.032), particularly in elderly patients, females, and individuals with low ADL at admission, body mass index of 18.5-24.9 kg/m(2), and New York Heart Association class IV. Conclusions: Our analyses highlight the possibility that acute-phase CR initiation may result in short-term improvement in ADL in patients hospitalized for AHF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据