3.8 Article

Life Cycle Assessment of Existing and Alternative Options for Municipal Solid Waste Management in Saint Petersburg and the Leningrad Region, Russia

期刊

RECYCLING
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/recycling7020019

关键词

waste management system; life cycle assessment; environmental impact; landfilling; incineration; source separation

资金

  1. South-East Finland-Russia CBC Program [KS1913]
  2. European Union
  3. Russian Federation
  4. Republic of Finland
  5. Department of Sustainability Science

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a life cycle assessment of the municipal solid waste management system in Saint Petersburg and its neighboring Leningrad region, showing that separate collection of waste can greatly reduce the environmental impact.
A waste reform was recently introduced in Russia to divert waste from landfills. To help advance the reform, this paper presents a life cycle assessment of the municipal solid waste management system in Russia's second largest city-Saint Petersburg-and its neighboring Leningrad region. Five scenarios were evaluated: the current state of the system (S0), its expected post-reform state in 2024 (S1), and its state improved by increased landfill gas collection (S2), by increased waste incineration (S3), and by separate collection of waste (S4). The environmental impact was assessed in terms of climate change, acidification, eutrophication, and abiotic resource depletion (fossil fuels). The results showed an overall reduction in the environmental impact of the waste management system across all impact categories and all scenarios studied. The largest reduction in all impact categories (except abiotic resource depletion) was achieved through source separation of municipal solid waste. Particularly, global warming potential was reduced from 0.328 kg CO2-eq./kg waste generated in S0 to 0.010 kg CO2-eq./kg waste in S4. Regarding abiotic resource depletion potential (fossil fuels), the incineration scenario is the most beneficial, since it reduces the impact by 573%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据