4.6 Article

Experimental and Numerical Study of an Active Solar Heating System with Soil Heat Storage for Greenhouses in Cold Climate Zones

期刊

BUILDINGS
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/buildings12040405

关键词

greenhouse; active solar heating system; soil heat storage; soil temperature; experiment

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2019MEE083]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study built a solar greenhouse with an active solar heating system and evaluated its applicability in cold areas. The results showed that the system effectively maintained suitable ground temperatures and improved plant growth in winter.
Root temperature is an important ecological factor affecting plant growth. A solar greenhouse with an active solar heating system was built in Jinan, in the cold climate zone of northern China. Experiments encompassing the complete cycle of heat collection, heat storage, and heat release were carried out. Using the experimental data, the numerical simulation of soil heat storage with a variable heat flow was executed using the ANSYS (ANSYS Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, USA) Fluent software. Soil temperature fields were studied on typical sunny days and typical cloudy days in the transition season and winter. The solar collector efficiency and coefficient of performance of the system were investigated. The applicability of this active solar soil heating system with soil heat storage for cold areas was evaluated. The results showed that the system effectively maintained suitable ground temperatures to prevent plant growth inhibition caused by low ground temperatures in winter. During the experimental period, the solar collector efficiency was 47% and the system's coefficient of performance was 67.70. The thermal performance of the system was much better than a traditional energy system. This study showed that this active solar heating system with soil heat storage is an economic and feasible way to increase soil temperatures in solar greenhouses in cold areas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据